Harry
McCallion, the author of this book, is an SAS legend. He served in the
Parachute Regiment, the SAS in Northern Ireland, then went to South Africa and
joined their special forces where he took part in the bloody bush war in
Mozambique. He returned to Blighty and the SAS once again, before finally
finding a home in the RUC. Before reading this novel, I had heard of Harry
McCallion, read about his colourful past. This is a man who confesses to having
enjoyed fighting and having no regrets concerning the killing. So it was with
not a little interest that I approached Ghosts Of The Past, the first novel of
his that I've read. Unfortunately, I was to be disappointed.
The first
reason for this was the number of grammatical and typological errors in the
book. I received my copy from NetGalley, so it could be that my copy was a
still to be edited preview. I doubt that however as the book was already on
sale through Amazon when I borrowed it. I don't know if the errors are down to
the author, or the publishers, Endeavour Press, but quite frankly the
manuscript was riddled with them and I found this got in the way of the flow of
the story.
The plot
of the story focuses on an RUC detective seconded to the Met. There's a murder
in a London park and our hero, alongside his Met colleagues, soon discover that
a mysterious Russian countess is involved. Without giving too much away the
plot becomes one about different factions of the Russian mafia trying to take
control of the European trade in Colombian cocaine and warring factions of the
IRA. And this leads to my second problem with the book. My issue wasn't with
the ideas raised by the plot, more their execution.
First
off, I found the Russian Countess, Natasha Romanov, to be just too much of a
stereotype. I found the same problem with the ace IRA hitman, Kane. Why in
these kind of books must we always have a beautiful, but deadly, femme fatale?
And while I respect the author's experiences in Northern Ireland, were the IRA
really all cold-hearted psychopaths? And was any IRA terrorist really as well
trained and lethal as Kane is made out to be?
Finally,
I found the story to be strangely dated. In this age of international Islamist
terror the fear of cocaine flooding our streets seems almost quaint. Don't get
me wrong, I realise that drugs are still a major societal problem, and just a
glance at the near civil war in Mexico is enough to convince anyone that drug
cartels have not gone away. But the tone the story is told in harks back to the
scare stories of the 1980's. For example, there's a scene on a Royal Naval
vessel where an MI5 character is explaining to the warship's captain why it is
so imperative that they intercept a big shipment of cocaine. The Captain says
something along the lines of, what's the fuss? The MI5 operative then gives
this speech about how drugs corrupt everything that they touch and should this
amount of drugs hit the streets of London then our political and judicial
system will go the way of Colombia's. It's all very earnest and reminiscent of something
out of The French Connection. We now know of course that drug trafficking is a
more chronic than acute problem. Yes, the profits can corrupt, but after
decades of heroin, cocaine, crack, ecstasy, etc, etc, we're yet to see the
doomsday scenario of societal breakdown as predicted here.
While I
would certainly read more from this author (he has a non-fiction account of his
life, and two other novels penned) that has more to do with his background than
my experience of this novel. I just hope that his other works are better than
this.
Two out
of five stars.
No comments:
Post a Comment